“Merry Christmas, you cold-hearted bastards” – Ian Dunt

“I wrote that the man’s expression “simply cannot be defined” but it contained “relief, and bafflement, and newfound innocence, and the first hesitant vulnerable expression of hope”. My main crime here was that this section was overwritten. My lesser crime was that it’s now demonstrably bullshit. Then, because I am a parody of myself, I wrote that his face reflected “the aspirations of centuries of liberal struggle”. It is therefore a shame that he seems to be an Assad loyalist putting on an act.

I can learn several things from this. First, I must never, ever, under any circumstances become a police detective. And second, we really do see what we want to see. We can project, especially in dramatic but changeable circumstances, the things we want to believe, the story of a world we wish to be true. We all have it within us to look a right mug and I have accomplished that here”

https://iandunt.substack.com/p/merry-christmas-you-cold-hearted

“Let boilerplate be boilerplate” – Dan Davies

“One of the tricks used to make transformer neural networks produce more human-sounding output is to introduce a bit of randomness (the “temperature” parameter), so that they select one of the closest few “near neighbour” tokens rather than always glomming onto the single smallest vector distance. Consideration of the function of boilerplate immediately shows why that’s problematic – as well as wasting everyone’s time trying to work out whether a minor change in verbal expression is significant, there’s a constant danger of creating something which actually does have a different effect than the boilerplate and changing contract terms by accident”

https://backofmind.substack.com/p/let-boilerplate-be-boilerplate

“Turning Off the TV in Your Mind” – Lincoln Michel

“To learn to photograph, you learn to think in angles and apertures. To learn to paint, you begin to think in brushstrokes and pigments. And to learn to write fiction, you start to think in sentences, POV, and other aspects of narrative prose. This takes a lot of time. Time studying and time practicing. No, there never are any shortcuts there.

This applies within mediums too. Thinking in fairy tales is different than thinking in hardboiled detective fiction. Thinking in aphorisms is different than thinking in longform essays. So on and so forth. (This is likely why so many artists can excel in one area but struggle in adjacent ones. Short story writers who can’t finish novels. Actors who flop at directing. Etc.)”

https://countercraft.substack.com/p/turning-off-the-tv-in-your-mind

“Do the work” – Julian Simpson

“The industry now is contracting and adapting. I would argue that the changes it is undergoing are changes for the better. I’ve spoken to a lot of movie execs over the last few weeks and not one of them has any interest in trying to set up a $200 million movie at a streamer; they’re all talking in terms of more modestly budgeted movies that might sell tickets at an actual movie theatre. The TV people still think there is a market for drama, but it has shrunk – the ideas need to be better, the budgets need to be significantly lower. And I think we’re slowly, s-l-o-w-l-y moving away from the godawful notion that everything has to be based on something else”

https://developmenthell.substack.com/p/do-the-work

“Death by a thousand substacks” – Tyler Denk (Big Desk Energy)

“Some of Substack’s largest publishers earn well over $1M annually; stuck paying Substack hundreds of thousands of dollars for what amounts to a simple API call to Stripe (something any junior developer could build in just a few hours).

Building within a walled garden has its limitations. Besides the lack of ownership, brand identity, audience data, and control of distribution… you’re locked into a closed ecosystem.

Substack doesn’t offer an API, webhooks, or integrations with any third party platform. That’s right — all of the incredible tools and platforms that make up the modern creator ecosystem are entirely shut off to those on Substack”

https://mail.bigdeskenergy.com/p/death-by-thousand-substacks

“The Ozempic Era Is Distorting What We See as Healthy” – KC Hoard (The Walrus)

“The BMI is controversial. In the 1830s, Belgian scientist and sociologist Adolphe Quetelet created what would eventually become known as the BMI to determine what body the socially ideal man would have. He based it on the measurements of white European men of his time, and didn’t intend for it to be applied to the bodies of women or people of colour. He also developed his system long before the contemporary stigma around obesity began to take root. Some doctors now apply additional measurements, like waist circumference, to determine whether a patient’s size is considered healthy. But size alone is not an effective measure of a person’s health”

https://thewalrus.ca/ozempic/

“The spreadsheet revolution” – Dan Davis

“Excel made a whole new style of working possible for the financial industry in two ways. First, it facilitated the creation of much bigger and more detailed financial models; in the days when you had to fill everything in yourself having worked it out on a pocket calculator, you would really think twice about whether you really needed to estimate staff costs separately from other costs, let alone about how many divisions and geographies you were going to model for big companies.

But much more importantly, it allowed you to work iteratively. Rather than thinking about what assumptions made the most business sense, then sitting down to project them, Excel encouraged you to just set out the forecasts, then sit around tweaking the assumptions up and down until you got an answer you could live with”

https://backofmind.substack.com/p/the-spreadsheet-revolution

“A little love song to the National Audit Office” – Ian Dunt

“They are really rather beautiful things, of the sort which we rarely appreciate. They’re the product of years of hard-fought for constitutional change. They are the kind of literature which a sophisticated political society produces, so that it can govern itself more effectively. They deserve a level of respect which we do not currently give them

But these reports only work where the political culture around them actually gives a damn. They rely on journalists and politicians bothering to read them, or at least skimming the executive summary. They rely on publications acknowledging that they exist and that their conclusions provide a final word on what is really happening”

https://iandunt.substack.com/p/a-little-love-song-to-the-national

“The End of The Twitter Era” – Ben Sandofsky

“Bluesky follows the classic crypto marketing strategy of rallying users behind a cause while downplaying their profit-driven motives. They make a big deal about filing as a Public Benefits Corporation, which means next to nothing.

Bluesky claims to be billionaire proof, which is either hopelessly naive or deliberately smarmy. Claims that their platform is open and decentralized are mostly bullshit. Nothing prevents the company from cutting off access to the network, just like Twitter did to third-party clients, and the option of spinning up your own Bluesky clone means nothing when the value a social network is the users and their network effects, not your tech stack.

You’re welcome to think I’m overly cynical, but when someone talks like a grifter, builds like a grifter, and raises money from grifters, they deserve all of the scrutiny of grifters”

https://www.sandofsky.com/end-of-twitter/

“Clintonism lost in 2000” – Freddie deBoer

“ If we could step back for just a moment and look not at the immediate question of which candidate and policy in which point of time, but at the general political strategy of the Democrats for the past 50 years – that is, moderating, triangulating, and other euphemisms for moving rightward – we would have to conclude that it has failed. And yet there is precious little appetite for actually coming up with a radically different approach, because ultimately politics is about taxes and the funding base of the party are rich people who won’t tolerate significantly higher taxes”

https://freddiedeboer.substack.com/p/clintonism-lost-in-2000